The Court of Appeal sitting in Abuja, on Wednesday, March 6, 2024, reversed the decision of the FCT High Court, which dismissed the objection raised by Julius Abure challenging his removal as the National Chairman of the Labour Party (LP).

It would be recalled that Justice Hamza Muazu of the FCT High Court, on May 13, 2023, dismissed the preliminary objection by Abure after a ruling on an ex-parte application which restrained him and three others – Farouk Ibrahim, Clement Ojukwu, and Oluchi Opara – from acting as national executives of the party.

The suit marked CV/2930/2023 was instituted by Martins Esikpali John, Lucky Shaibu, Isah Zekeri, Omogbai Frank, Abokhaiu Aliu, Ayohkaire Lateef, John Elomah, and Ayobami Arabambi.

The plaintiffs told the court that the defendants forged several documents of the court to carry out unlawful substitutions in the last elections.

Abure through his lawyer, Alex Ejesieme, filed a preliminary objection against the suit, saying that an allegation of forgery against his clients cannot be brought before the court by way of an originating summon.

Ejesieme alleged that the plaintiffs are not members of the LP and therefore lack the locus standi to institute the suit, adding that the matter borders on the internal issues of the party which the court cannot interfere with.

LP suspends treasurer for accusing Abure, others of N3.5bn fraud

Justice Muazu held that the court has jurisdiction to hear the matter even though it relates to the party’s internal affairs, as there would have no need to interfere, had the party been at peace.

He added that the plaintiffs were right to have instituted the case by originating summons and subsequently restrained Abure and his executives from acting as national officers of the party.

Dissatisfied, Abure proceeded to appeal the judgement, seeking a determination of whether the lower court was right in the dismissal of his preliminary objection to his removal as National Chairman.

Delivering the lead judgement on Wednesday, Justice Hamma Akawu Barka held that the appeal filed by Abure was meritorious and set aside the earlier judgement of the lower court.

Justice Barka held that the process applied by the lower court was incompetent as it wrongly assumed jurisdiction over the case.

The judge said issues bothering on forgery, perjury, and conspiracy are unproven and deals with serious issues of fact, so the suit should not begin with an originating summon.

The judge also held that the lower court was wrong to interfere in the internal affairs of the political party.

Justice Barka, therefore, held that the appeal has merit and set aside the decision of the lower court.

The judge also declared a fine of N1 million on the respondents.

The Star