Top Stories

Senate rejects Buhari’s new Electoral Act Amendment Bill

The Senate on Wednesday rejected President Muhammdu Buhari’s Bill seeking to amend the recently passed Electoral Act, 2022.

The Bill titled: “A Bill for an Act to amend the Electoral Act 2022 and for related matters, 2022,” was rejected overwhelmingly by senators at second reading.

The bill had successfully passed the first reading.

But it was thrown out on Wednesday.

Senators spoke against the bill.

In the new bill, Buhari is seeking amendment of Section 84 (12) of the Electoral Amendment Act 2022.

The President had while signing the 2022 Electoral Amendment Bill on February 25, complained that the provision constituted fundamental defect, saying it was in conflict with extant constitutional provisions.

According to him, section 84 (12) constitutes a disenfranchisement of serving political office holders from voting or being voted for at conventions or congresses of any political party.

This, he said, was for the purpose of the nomination of candidates for any election in cases where it holds earlier than 30 days to the national election.

The section reads: “No political appointee at any level shall be voting delegate or be voted for at the convention or congress of any political party for the purpose of the nomination of candidates for any election.”

He stated that the provision introduced qualification and disqualification criteria that ultra vires the Constitution by way of importing blanket restriction and disqualification.

This he said was basically for serving political office holders of which they were constitutionally accorded protection.

READ ALSO: At last, Buhari signs Electoral Act Amendment Bill into law

The Federal High Court had on Tuesday March 7, stopped Buhari, Attorney General of the Federation and the National Assembly from tampering with the newly amended Electoral Act 2022.

Justice Inyang Ekwo, in a ruling on an ex parte application by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) agreed that the electoral act had become a valid law and could not be tampered with without following due process.

Ekwo held that the proper place to challenge validity of any existing law was in a court of competent jurisdiction.

Details later…

The Star

Editor

Recent Posts

Premier League: Liverpool thrash Tottenham in 9-goal thriller

Liverpool moved four points clear at the top of the Premier League after both Luis…

8 hours ago

EPL: Bournemouth thrash Man United at Old Trafford as Everton draw Chelsea

Bournemouth thrashed Manchester United 3-0 in the Premier League at a chilly Old Trafford on…

10 hours ago

‘It’ll improve access to education’: Kaduna poly lauds Uba Sani on retirement age

Nuhu Bamali Polytechnic has commended Kaduna State Governor Uba Sani for increasing the retirement age…

11 hours ago

Atiku: 2025 budget lacks reforms to tackle Nigeria’s woes

Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar says the 2025 budget presented by President Bola Tinubu to…

11 hours ago

Ijaw youths raise the alarm: Oil thieves after Kyari, Tompolo, Otuaro

The Ijaw Youths Network has raised the alarm over the intensified blackmail of huge international…

12 hours ago

NDLEA stops Italy-based businesswoman from exporting drugs via Lagos airport

The operatives of the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA) have foiled an attempt by…

15 hours ago

This website uses cookies.